Additionally, the M1A3 may incorporate a new generation of advanced networking capabilities and enhanced armor protection. Other improvements are to include a lighter mm gun, added road wheels with improved suspension, a more durable track, lighter armor, long-range precision armaments, and infrared camera and laser detectors. A new internal computer system is also planned, with current cabling replaced by fiber-optic cables that can reduce weight by two tons. The developing Ground Combat Vehicle seeks to generate a family of combat vehicles that could permanently replace the M1 as well as many other U.
The Army anticipates that the Abrams may remain in service until In the plant would reopen to upgrade existing tanks. The downside to the three-year plant closing is the loss of the skilled human capital required to build the M1.
These types of job skills must be learned on the job as the building is too unique to offer any type of educational program in a trade school environment.
The buy is to mitigate Abrams FLIR industrial base risks, and sustain development and production capability. Congress and General Dynamics had been criticized for redirecting money to keep production lines open.
General Dynamics contends that they are not forcing more tanks onto the Army, but that they are changing their configuration to make them the most modern. At the time, most Army National Guard units operated the M1A1, while only two Guard units and the rest of the Army had upgraded versions. The 12 upgraded tanks will be going to the National Guard to expand a "pure fleet. Makers of those subcomponents were not in danger of going out of business, but a prolonged shutdown could cause them to lose their ability to produce them.
Foreign sales are also not certain to keep orders, as planned contracts from Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Iraq, and Egypt have been pushed back or are unknown. Even though money is being spent to protect the industrial base, some feel those strategic choices should not be made by members of Congress, especially those with the facilities in their district.
There is still risk of production gaps even with production extended through With funds awarded before recapitalization is needed, budgetary pressures may push planned new upgrades for the Abrams from to Military Wiki Explore. Popular pages. Project maintenance. Register Don't have an account?
History of the M1 Abrams. Edit source History Talk 0. Of the nine Abrams destroyed, seven were due to friendly fire, and two were intentionally destroyed to prevent capture after they became disabled. Other Abrams tanks were damaged by enemy fire, land mines, on-board fires, or to prevent capture after they became disabled.
The crew, uninjured, was evacuating the disabled tank when two DU rounds hit the tank in the left side of the hull and exited through the right side. The tank commander, driver, and gunner sustained injuries from fragments.
The loader, who was already outside the tank, was uninjured. A crew members assisted in rescuing A's crew. CALL reported that the crew involved in the incident stated that one projectile had bounced off the tank and the other had embedded itself in the armor.
The three most probable answers are T main gun, dismounted anti-tank missile, or Apache launched Hellfire missile. The fact that Apaches were operating to our rear and witnesses' reports of high round trajectory support the friendly fire theory. However, ballistics reports suggest that mm HEAT rounds produced the damage on some of the tanks.
Visual examination of others reveals one obvious sabot hole. Overall, the physical evidence implies that T fire took out our tanks, but the friendly fire possibility cannot be excluded. Note that the M1 was hit in the rear hull, not in the turret. The crew is extracted safely and the tank left behind, not before it is destroyed by the task force commander who fires two rounds into it.
The first bounces off, the second penetrates and set it on fire[…] The terrain is still causing problems. On the attack several vehicles get embedded in mud and can't be extracted. The problem is complicated by enemy missile and machine gun fire.
Two tanks and two armored personnel carriers are destroyed and discarded. Motorbooks International, Crusade, The untold story of the Persian Gulf War. Houghton Mifflin Company, Buchs, B. Commander, Knights In the Desert. Three mm DU rounds hit B -- one striking just below the turret, killing the gunner. After action report. March Robert H.
Brassey's, , p. Russia with its 12, tanks unsurprisingly has the biggest armor holdings. The United States is the number-two tank power with 6, vehicles.
In the realm of military resources on land, China possesses 3, tanks, 33, armoured vehicles, 3, self-propelled artillery, 3, towed artillery, and 2, rocket projectors. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Skip to content Home Articles How many tanks were deployed in Iraq? Ben Davis February 28, How many tanks were deployed in Iraq? How many Abrams tanks does Iraq have? The driver has a digital display while the gunner sights has been upgraded.
IVIS will eventually have voice recognition and digital mapping too. The Abrams has been an amazing platform over the last 40 years. Due to various counter-insurgency battles during the war on terror, the Abrams has taken a back seat to dismounted infantry and cavalry units who were fighting insurgents.
However, in a potential armored battle against Russia or China, the Army will have a decided advantage with the various Abrams upgrades. Unfortunately, the tank fight will not include the Marine Corps, as the marines have shut down their armor branch and have done away with the marine version of the Abrams tank. But the Army is still more than capable of dominating in armored warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.
Army Infantry officer. MPF is a start, but I think we are looking for a modular armor system on a tank designed for an urban setting. High angle, shorter gun. Same sort of math on a surface connector. Any replacement would be subject to all the greed and incompetence which has plagued so many other major defense acquisition programs.
You can predict that the product will be years late and billions and billions over budget resulting in a fraction of predicted units being built with a good likelihood of an unreliable and problematic product to boot. Forget it. This tank is very good.
Keep it for the foreseeable future. The truth is that the US Army DID try to replace the M1 Abrams many times over the decades but these programs were canceled with just studies and prototypes made. I would have replaced the entire turret with a total newly designed one, just like the Leopard 2 Next Generation tank.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Original Reporting.
0コメント